Longevity in the 21st century has ceased to be a rare phenomenon and has become a global trend, driven by the synthesis of achievements in medicine, biotechnology, and socio-economic changes. If in the 20th century the key task was to overcome child mortality and infectious diseases, which led to a sharp increase in life expectancy, then the challenge of the current century is the fight against chronic age-related diseases and the compression of morbidity (squeezing the period of illness to the end of life). Modern science of aging — gerontology — shifts the focus from the treatment of individual diseases to the impact on the fundamental mechanisms of aging as the root cause.
In 2013, in a landmark article by Carlos López-Otín, nine molecular and cellular signs of aging were formulated. They have become a roadmap for research in the field of longevity:
Genomic instability (accumulation of DNA damage).
Shortening of telomeres (protective "caps" at the ends of chromosomes).
Epi-genetic changes (disruption of "reading" of genes without changing the DNA code).
Loss of proteostasis (failure in the protein quality control system).
Disruption of nutrient regulation (reduced sensitivity to insulin, etc.).
Mitochondrial dysfunction (cellular energy stations).
Cellular aging (senescence) — accumulation of "zombie cells" that do not divide but secrete harmful substances.
Exhaustion of the stem cell pool.
Change in intercellular communication (chronic systemic inflammation — "inflammaging").
Modern strategies are aimed at correcting these signs. For example:
Senolytics — a class of drugs that selectively destroy senescent "zombie cells". Quercetin (found in apples, onions) and dasatinib (a leukemia drug) in combination have shown rejuvenating effects in animal models.
Metformin (a sugar-lowering drug) is being studied in a large-scale clinical study TAME as a means of slowing down aging by improving metabolism and reducing inflammation.
Rapamycin (an immunosuppressant) — a powerful inhibitor of the mTOR pathway, a key regulator of growth and aging. In mice, it has demonstrated impressive increases in lifespan and quality of life.
Interesting fact: Studies on the nematode C. elegans have shown that the precise editing of just one gene (*daf-2*) can double their lifespan. This gene is an analog of the human insulin receptor gene, confirming the link between metabolism and longevity.
The 21st century is the era of precision and predictive medicine.
Wearable devices and telemedicine allow for continuous monitoring of key biometric indicators (pulse, sleep, activity, ECG), detecting deviations at an early stage.
Genome sequencing has become accessible. Knowledge of genetic risks (such as a predisposition to Alzheimer's disease through the APOE4 gene) allows for the development of personalized preventive strategies.
Artificial intelligence analyzes vast amounts of medical data, identifying complex patterns and predicting risks of diseases, allowing for proactive action.
Longevity is not only a biological but also a social problem. The phenomenon of "blue zones" (regions with an abnormally high concentration of centenarians: Okinawa in Japan, Sardinia in Italy, Ikaria in Greece, Loma-Linda in the USA, Nicoya in Costa Rica) has identified common non-material factors:
Natural physical activity, integrated into daily life (walking, gardening).
A clear sense of life purpose ("ikigai" in Okinawa).
Strong social connections and involvement in community life.
Stress management through rituals (siesta, prayer, meditation).
A plant-based diet with moderate calorie intake.
These principles show that environment and lifestyle remain the foundation of longevity, even in the age of high technology.
Example: In Singapore, a country with one of the highest life expectancies in the world (83.5 years), the achievement has been the result of not genetics, but well-thought-out national policy. It includes: a strict system of public health, promotion of healthy eating, creation of a city environment that encourages activity (parks, pedestrian zones), and a high level of medical care.
The pursuit of radical life extension raises serious questions:
Inequality: Will advanced anti-aging therapies be accessible only to the wealthy, deepening the social divide?
Demographic burden: How will the structure of society, the economy, and the pension system change if a significant part of the population will live to 100-120 years?
Psychological adaptation: Is humanity ready for "eternal youth" and long careers? What will give meaning to life in a multiply extended time horizon?
Longevity in the 21st century is an interdisciplinary project at the intersection of biology, technology, and socio-humanitarian sciences. Progress is moving along two parallel paths:
"Bottom-up" — through lifestyle changes based on data from "blue zones" and preventive medicine.
"Top-down" — through breakthrough biomedicine interventions (gene therapy, senolytics, cell reprogramming), aimed at correcting the very foundations of aging.
The ideal of modern longevity is not just to live to 120 years, but to live to 100+ in a state of physical and mental well-being, social involvement, and meaningfulness. Achieving this goal will require not only scientific discoveries but also a rethinking of social institutions, economic models, and the very philosophy of human life. The 21st century promises to become the century when aging can start to become a manageable, and in the distant future — even an reversible biological process.
New publications: |
Popular with readers: |
News from other countries: |
![]() |
Editorial Contacts |
About · News · For Advertisers |
Digital Library of Kazakhstan ® All rights reserved.
2017-2026, BIBLIO.KZ is a part of Libmonster, international library network (open map) Keeping the heritage of Kazakhstan |
US-Great Britain
Sweden
Serbia
Russia
Belarus
Ukraine
Kazakhstan
Moldova
Tajikistan
Estonia
Russia-2
Belarus-2