Goodness and Christmas: Historical Anthropology and Theology of Festive Charity

The connection between the celebration of Christmas and acts of goodness is not only a cultural cliché but also a complex historical-anthropological phenomenon with deep theological roots. This connection has evolved from specific social rituals in agrarian societies to a globalized moral imperative, while maintaining its archetypal power.

Theological Foundations: Incarnation as an Act of Cosmic Goodness

The foundation of Christian understanding lies in the concept of kenosis — self-emptying, divine self-abasement. Apostle Paul in the Epistle to the Philippians (2:6-8) describes Incarnation as an act of unimaginable generosity and humility: God taking human nature in conditions of poverty and vulnerability (cave, manger). Thus, the very celebration of Christmas affirms goodness as an essential property of God, manifested in the world. This is not an abstract quality, but a sacrificial descent that makes possible a responsive movement of humanity.

Middle Ages exegesis (such as that of Francis of Assisi) emphasized that God appeared in the vulnerability of the Baby, needing protection and warmth from animals and people. This created a paradigm: to show goodness to the weak means to resemble the participants of the Christmas night. Goodness becomes an imitation of Christ (imitatio Christi) in his incarnated, earthly form.

Historical Anthropology: From "Christmas Peace" to Charity

In pre-industrial European societies, especially within the German and Scandinavian tradition, the period around Christmas (Twelve Days) was a time of social truce and inversion. Specific practices were developed:

Boxing Day (Day of Gifts, December 26). In England, its origins date back to the medieval custom when lords gave their servants, and merchants — to apprentices and the poor — "Christmas boxes" with money, food, and clothing. This was a formalized act of goodness, reinforcing patriarchal relations but also redistributing benefits.

The custom of the "Yule log." Its smoldering embers were kept throughout the year as a home protector, and the ceremony was accompanied by a feast for all present, including workers, symbolizing the unity of the household community.

The practice of "Christmas meat." In the Slavic and Baltic tradition, it was important to have a joint meal, trying to invite lonely people. Sharing food before the fast meant to resemble the Magi, bringing gifts.

Interesting fact: Charles Dickens in "A Christmas Carol" (1843) did not just praise goodness but reacted to a specific social context — the cruelty of workhouses and the utilitarianism of early industrial capitalism. The image of Scrooge transformed by spirits became a manifesto of Victorian charity that shifted the focus from communal mutual aid to individual, morally motivated benevolence of the bourgeoisie.

Psychology and Neurology of Festive Goodness

Modern research shows that the Christmas period can indeed enhance prosocial behavior. This is facilitated by a complex of factors:

Normative pressure: Social expectations to be "good and generous" during the holiday create a powerful behavioral pattern.

The "warm glow" effect: Acts of giving activate the brain's pleasure centers (nucleus accumbens, ventral pallidum).

Nostalgia: Nostalgic memories, often associated with childhood Christmas, increase empathy and the desire to create similar positive emotions in others.

However, scientists (such as psychologists from Tilburg University) also note the "limited morality effect": a surge of goodness in December may lead to "moral exhaustion" and a decrease in altruistic activity in January-February, when help is needed just as much.

Criticism and Modern Transformations

In the 21st century, the connection "Christmas = goodness" is criticized from several sides:

Hypercommercialization. Gift-giving has turned into an obligatory consumer race, where the act of goodness is measured by the value of the gift, distorting the original meaning.

Seasonal, selective goodness. Help to the homeless and needy becomes a "holiday trend," while their systemic problems are ignored for the rest of the year.

Ethical paradox. The desire to create the "perfect Christmas" for one's family may lead to stress, irritation, and conflicts, which are opposite to the spirit of goodness.

Conclusion: Between Ritual and Existential Gesture

Thus, goodness in the context of Christmas exists in tension between an established ritual and a spontaneous existential gesture. Its historical power lies in its ability to temporarily suspend the ordinary social order, reminding us of the fundamental equality of all before the fact of birth, vulnerability, and hope.

True Christmas goodness, in its theological dimension, is not a sentimental feeling but an action aimed at overcoming isolation. It reproduces the logic of Incarnation: descending to another, meeting them in their concrete, possibly unattractive reality (as in a stable), and giving warmth without guarantee of a response. From medieval Christmas boxes to modern charitable flash mobs — this practice remains an attempt to respond to the original gift that, according to Christian doctrine, was given to humanity in the night of Bethlehem. In this sense, festive goodness is not just a tradition but a living, albeit problematic, experience of transmitting that very "benevolent love" (Greek. εὐδοκία) about which the angels sang on the Christmas night (Lk. 2:14).
© biblio.kz

Permanent link to this publication: